Worth watching
Headline does not badge current employer
Strongest stable signal
The most useful clue was subtle: people who later moved were much less likely to define themselves through their current employer in the headline.
What we sawOnly 40.8% of cases still named their employer, versus 71.9% of controls; the pattern survived within leadership roles.
Keep in mind: The strongest stable behavior term; effect is concentrated in senior bands.
Worth watching
Open-to-work flag
Strong, but rare
The clearest explicit signal: someone has publicly raised their hand. It mattered a lot when present, but almost nobody in the sample used it.
What we sawThe flag appeared in 3.5% of job-change cases versus 0.2% of controls.
Keep in mind: Only 15 flag-bearers; direction is credible, magnitude is not precise.
Worth watching
Share of completed stints under 12 months
Useful history signal
Past switching behavior was informative. People with a larger share of short completed stints ranked higher in the behavior-only model.
What we sawThe fitted design odds rose about 1.7× for each 25-point increase in the short-stint share.
Keep in mind: A career-shape feature, not evidence of current intent by itself.
Do not overread
Seeker language in headline
Mostly overlap
Phrases like “seeking,” “available,” or “open to opportunities” look useful at first. Most of that information disappears once we know whether the headline still names the current employer.
What we sawIt was common in a simple comparison, but added little independent information in the six-factor fit.
Keep in mind: Mostly collinear with employer omission in this fit.
Do not overread
Second ongoing role
Not a stable tell
A board seat, advisory role, or second ongoing job can look like an exit ramp. In this senior-heavy sample it was actually more common among the controls.
What we sawPresent for 16.7% of cases versus 23.4% of controls; the direction becomes unstable within seniority bands.
Keep in mind: Population-conditional; in the senior-heavy controls this often meant board or advisory work.
Do not overread
Current tenure
Too noisy alone
Short current tenure sounds intuitive, but cache timing and seniority composition explain too much of the apparent gap.
What we sawThe standalone short-tenure effect disappeared after the clock and composition checks.
Keep in mind: Do not use current tenure as a standalone exit claim; cache age and missingness distort it.